Supreme Court Strikes Down Tribunal Reforms Act
The Supreme Court of India has invalidated the Tribunal Reforms Act of 2021, emphasizing the need for judicial independence.
Why This Matters
This ruling has far-reaching implications for India's judicial system, engaging legal professionals and the public on issues of justice and governance.
Public Sentiment Summary
The public sentiment is predominantly negative towards the Supreme Court's ruling, with widespread accusations of judicial overreach, perceived bias, and a lack of integrity within the legal system. Calls for significant reforms, including the abolition of the Collegium system and increased governmental oversight, are prevalent, alongside frustrations directed at both the ruling administration and opposition for failing to address these issues. However, there are also voices recognizing the importance of judicial independence, although skepticism remains regarding the judiciary's ability to function effectively without reform.
Highlighted Comments
सुप्रीम कोर्ट जनता का प्रतिनिधित्व नहीं करती है लोक तंत्र में जो संस्थान जनता का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं उनका निर्णय ही मान्य होना चाहिए
सरकार को तुरंत फिर से त्रिमुनल लागू करना चाहिए
When judges can be bought there is no justice system.
Justice delayed is justice denied. The alarming delays in our justice system are looked down upon by our own people and by foreign investors.
Great practical points made by Justice Dhingra! Specialisation of courts is the need of the hour.
Parties Involved
- Supreme Court
- Indian Government
- Opposition Parties
What the people want
Supreme Court: Address public concerns over judicial integrity and independence, ensuring transparency in your processes.
Indian Government: Take immediate action to reform the judicial system, focusing on accountability and the abolition of the Collegium system.
Opposition Parties: Engage in constructive dialogue to address these pressing judicial concerns and advocate for reforms.